CWE-911: Improper Update of Reference Count

What is Improper Update of Reference Count?

• Overview: Improper Update of Reference Count (CWE-911) occurs when a program manages resources using reference counts but fails to update these counts correctly, leading to potential resource mismanagement.

• Exploitation Methods:

• Attackers can exploit this by causing a resource to be prematurely de-allocated if the reference count mistakenly drops to zero.
• Common attack patterns include manipulating program execution to skip reference count updates or causing multiple updates to incorrectly inflate the count.

• Security Impact:

• Direct consequences include resource leaks or premature resource release, which may lead to crashes or denial of service.
• Potential cascading effects involve memory corruption or data leaks if resources are reused incorrectly.
• Business impact can involve system downtime, loss of sensitive information, or increased maintenance costs.

• Prevention Guidelines:

• Specific code-level fixes include ensuring reference counting logic is correctly implemented and thoroughly tested.
• Security best practices involve using automatic memory management features provided by modern programming languages when possible.
• Recommended tools and frameworks include static analysis tools to detect improper reference counting and employing resource management libraries that automate count handling.

Corgea can automatically detect and fix Improper Update of Reference Count in your codebase. [Try Corgea free today](https://corgea.app).

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Medium

Affected Languages: C, C++, Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not specified

Vulnerable Code Example

C Example

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

// A simple structure to demonstrate reference counting
typedef struct {
    int *data;
    int ref_count; // reference count
} RefCountedObject;

// Function to create a new RefCountedObject
RefCountedObject* create_object() {
    RefCountedObject* obj = (RefCountedObject*)malloc(sizeof(RefCountedObject));
    if (obj != NULL) {
        obj->data = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int));
        *(obj->data) = 42; // dummy data
        obj->ref_count = 1; // initial reference count
    }
    return obj;
}

// Function to improperly manage the reference count
void use_object(RefCountedObject* obj) {
    // Increasing reference count without proper synchronization
    obj->ref_count++;

    // ... use the object ...

    // Decrementing reference count incorrectly
    obj->ref_count--;

    // Check if reference count reaches zero
    if (obj->ref_count <= 0) {
        free(obj->data);
        free(obj);
    }
}

int main() {
    RefCountedObject* obj = create_object();
    use_object(obj);
    return 0;
}

Key Vulnerabilities:

• Improper Increment and Decrement: The reference count is incremented and decremented without ensuring atomicity, leading to potential race conditions in a multi-threaded environment.
• Incorrect Reference Count Management: The decrement check (obj->ref_count <= 0) could lead to double-free vulnerabilities if the count is not managed correctly.

How to fix Improper Update of Reference Count?

To fix the improper update of reference count, the following best practices should be implemented:

1. Atomic Operations: Use atomic operations for incrementing and decrementing the reference count to avoid race conditions, especially in multi-threaded applications.
2. Thread Safety: Use synchronization mechanisms such as mutexes when modifying shared resources.
3. Consistent Reference Management: Ensure that the logic for incrementing and decrementing the reference count is consistent and correctly reflects the actual usage of the object.
4. Correct Deallocation: Only free the object when the reference count reliably reaches zero.

Fixed Code Example

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdatomic.h>
#include <pthread.h>

// A simple structure to demonstrate reference counting
typedef struct {
    int *data;
    atomic_int ref_count; // atomic reference count
    pthread_mutex_t lock; // mutex for thread safety
} RefCountedObject;

// Function to create a new RefCountedObject
RefCountedObject* create_object() {
    RefCountedObject* obj = (RefCountedObject*)malloc(sizeof(RefCountedObject));
    if (obj != NULL) {
        obj->data = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int));
        *(obj->data) = 42; // dummy data
        atomic_init(&obj->ref_count, 1); // initial reference count
        pthread_mutex_init(&obj->lock, NULL); // initialize mutex
    }
    return obj;
}

// Function to safely manage the reference count
void use_object(RefCountedObject* obj) {
    pthread_mutex_lock(&obj->lock); // lock for thread safety
    atomic_fetch_add(&obj->ref_count, 1); // atomic increment
    pthread_mutex_unlock(&obj->lock); // unlock after increment

    // ... use the object ...

    pthread_mutex_lock(&obj->lock); // lock for thread safety
    if (atomic_fetch_sub(&obj->ref_count, 1) == 1) { // atomic decrement and check
        free(obj->data);
        pthread_mutex_destroy(&obj->lock); // destroy mutex
        free(obj);
    } else {
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&obj->lock); // unlock if not freeing
    }
}

int main() {
    RefCountedObject* obj = create_object();
    use_object(obj);
    return 0;
}

Key Fixes:

• Atomic Reference Count: Used stdatomic.h to handle the reference count atomically, preventing race conditions.
• Mutex for Synchronization: Added a mutex to ensure that modifications to the reference count are thread-safe.
• Correct Deallocation: The object is only freed when the reference count reaches zero, ensuring correct resource management.