CWE-650: Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side
Learn about CWE-650 (Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side), its security impact, exploitation methods, and prevention guidelines.
What is Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side?
• Overview: Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side (CWE-650) occurs when an application assumes that HTTP GET requests are only used for data retrieval and do not alter server-side resources, which may lead to unintended state changes if GET requests are improperly handled.
• Exploitation Methods:
- Attackers can exploit this by crafting GET requests that modify or delete resources, bypassing intended access controls.
- Common attack patterns include using GET requests to perform actions typically reserved for POST, PUT, or DELETE methods, like updating or deleting data.
• Security Impact:
- Direct consequences include unauthorized data modification, deletion, or creation, potentially compromising data integrity.
- Potential cascading effects might involve further unauthorized access or data exposure if state changes lead to security misconfigurations.
- Business impact could involve data breaches, loss of customer trust, regulatory fines, and operational disruption.
• Prevention Guidelines:
- Ensure that GET requests do not have side effects or alter server-side resources; use appropriate HTTP methods for state-changing operations.
- Implement strict access controls and validation to ensure that only authorized users can perform actions that modify resources.
- Recommended tools and frameworks include web application firewalls (WAFs) and secure coding practices in frameworks that enforce RESTful principles, ensuring correct use of HTTP methods.
Technical Details
Likelihood of Exploit:
Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific
Affected Technologies: Not specified
Vulnerable Code Example
from flask import Flask, request
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/update_user/<int:user_id>', methods=['GET', 'POST'])
def update_user(user_id):
# Vulnerability: Using GET for state-changing operations
# GET requests should not alter server state as they can be cached or pre-fetched by browsers
if request.method == 'GET':
# Insecure: Modifying user data via GET request
update_user_in_db(user_id, request.args.get('name'), request.args.get('email'))
return "User updated via GET", 200
elif request.method == 'POST':
update_user_in_db(user_id, request.form['name'], request.form['email'])
return "User updated via POST", 200
def update_user_in_db(user_id, name, email):
# Simulated database update
print(f"Updating user {user_id} with name={name}, email={email}")
How to fix Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side?
To address this vulnerability, it's crucial to restrict state-changing operations to HTTP methods specifically intended for such purposes, such as POST, PUT, or DELETE. GET requests should strictly be used for safe, read-only operations.
The best practice is to:
- Ensure GET requests do not perform operations that change the server's state.
- Use POST or other appropriate methods for operations that modify server state.
- Validate HTTP methods for each route to ensure compliance with RESTful standards.
Fixed Code Example
from flask import Flask, request
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/update_user/<int:user_id>', methods=['POST'])
def update_user(user_id):
# Fix: Restrict the endpoint to use POST method only
# This ensures that state changes are made through methods intended for such use
update_user_in_db(user_id, request.form['name'], request.form['email'])
return "User updated via POST", 200
def update_user_in_db(user_id, name, email):
# Simulated database update
print(f"Updating user {user_id} with name={name}, email={email}")
In the fixed code, the update_user
endpoint is restricted to POST requests only. This change ensures that any state-changing operation is explicitly requested via a method that is semantically intended for such changes, preventing unauthorized modifications through GET requests. This aligns with RESTful principles, enhancing both security and clarity in API design.