CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
Learn about CWE-407 (Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity), its security impact, exploitation methods, and prevention guidelines.
What is Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity?
• Overview: An inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability occurs when an algorithm's worst-case performance is poor, leading to significant slowdowns or resource exhaustion. This can be exploited by attackers who craft inputs that trigger these worst-case scenarios, potentially degrading system performance.
• Exploitation Methods:
- Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted inputs that force the algorithm to operate at its worst-case complexity.
- Common attack patterns include using large or specially structured data sets that are known to cause the algorithm to slow down significantly.
• Security Impact:
- Direct consequences of successful exploitation include degraded system performance, increased response times, and potential denial of service (DoS).
- Potential cascading effects can impact other systems or components due to resource exhaustion or bottlenecks.
- Business impact includes loss of service availability, reduced user satisfaction, and potential financial losses due to downtime or decreased efficiency.
• Prevention Guidelines:
- Specific code-level fixes include optimizing algorithms to have better worst-case performance and using data structures that provide efficient operation across a range of inputs.
- Security best practices involve conducting thorough performance testing with a wide variety of input scenarios to identify and address inefficiencies.
- Recommended tools and frameworks include using profiling tools to identify performance bottlenecks and employing libraries with well-tested, efficient algorithms.
Corgea can automatically detect and fix Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in your codebase. Try Corgea free today.
Technical Details
Likelihood of Exploit:
Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific
Affected Technologies: Not specified
Vulnerable Code Example
def inefficient_search(data, target):
# This is a naive search algorithm with O(n^3) complexity
# It checks each substring of 'data' to see if it matches 'target'
for i in range(len(data)): # Iterate over each starting point
for j in range(i + 1, len(data) + 1): # Iterate over each ending point
if data[i:j] == target: # Compare substring with target
return True
return False
data = "a" * 10000 # A large input string
target = "a" * 9999 + "b" # A crafted target to reach worst-case complexity
inefficient_search(data, target)
Explanation of Vulnerability
The vulnerability in the code arises from the inefficient O(n^3) complexity of the naive substring search algorithm. This inefficiency can be exploited by an attacker by providing large inputs that trigger the worst-case scenario, leading to performance degradation or denial of service. The algorithm checks every possible substring, resulting in unnecessary and excessive computations.
How to fix Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity?
Fixed Code Example
def kmp_search(data, target):
# This function implements the KMP algorithm for efficient substring searching
def build_lps(target):
# Build the longest prefix suffix (LPS) array
lps = [0] * len(target)
length = 0
i = 1
while i < len(target):
if target[i] == target[length]:
length += 1
lps[i] = length
i += 1
else:
if length != 0:
length = lps[length - 1]
else:
lps[i] = 0
i += 1
return lps
lps = build_lps(target)
i = 0 # index for data
j = 0 # index for target
while i < len(data):
if target[j] == data[i]:
i += 1
j += 1
if j == len(target):
return True
elif i < len(data) and target[j] != data[i]:
if j != 0:
j = lps[j - 1]
else:
i += 1
return False
data = "a" * 10000
target = "a" * 9999 + "b"
kmp_search(data, target) # Use the efficient KMP search algorithm
Explanation of Fix
In the fixed code, the kmp_search
function uses the Knuth-Morris-Pratt algorithm, which significantly improves the efficiency of substring searching. The KMP algorithm preprocesses the target string to create an LPS (longest prefix suffix) array, which allows it to skip unnecessary comparisons, ensuring the search runs in O(n + m) time relative to the size of the input and target. This ensures that even in the worst-case scenario, the algorithm remains efficient and prevents performance degradation due to large inputs.