CWE-368: Context Switching Race Condition
Learn about CWE-368 (Context Switching Race Condition), its security impact, exploitation methods, and prevention guidelines.
What is Context Switching Race Condition?
• Overview: Context Switching Race Condition occurs when a software system performs a series of non-atomic actions to transition between different security contexts, such as privilege levels, and a race condition allows an attacker to interfere with or alter the behavior of the system during this transition.
• Exploitation Methods:
- Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by timing their actions to coincide with the context switch, allowing them to execute unauthorized actions.
- Common attack patterns include manipulating shared resources or state during the switch, or injecting malicious inputs that are processed with elevated privileges.
• Security Impact:
- Direct consequences of successful exploitation include unauthorized access to privileged information or resources.
- Potential cascading effects could lead to broader system compromise or further exploitation of other vulnerabilities.
- Business impact might involve unauthorized data access, data breaches, or service disruptions, leading to financial loss and reputational damage.
• Prevention Guidelines:
- Specific code-level fixes include implementing atomic operations for context switching to ensure actions cannot be interrupted or altered.
- Security best practices involve validating inputs and outputs at each context boundary and ensuring state integrity throughout the transition.
- Recommended tools and frameworks include those that support atomic transactions and race condition detection, such as concurrency models and static analysis tools.
Corgea can automatically detect and fix Context Switching Race Condition in your codebase. Try Corgea free today.
Technical Details
Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified
Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific
Affected Technologies: Not specified
Vulnerable Code Example
import threading
class AccountManager:
def __init__(self):
self.current_user = None
def switch_user(self, user):
# Vulnerable code: context switch is not atomic
self.current_user = user # This line is vulnerable to race conditions
# Some operations that assume current_user is the correct user
self.perform_sensitive_operation()
def perform_sensitive_operation(self):
# Sensitive operation that should only be performed by the current user
print(f"Performing operation for {self.current_user}")
def user_switching_simulation():
manager = AccountManager()
def switch_to_user(user):
manager.switch_user(user)
# Simulating context switch by threads
thread1 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User1",))
thread2 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User2",))
thread1.start()
thread2.start()
thread1.join()
thread2.join()
user_switching_simulation()
Explanation
In this code, switch_user()
updates the current_user
and then performs a sensitive operation assuming that the current_user
is correctly set. However, this context switch is not atomic, leading to a race condition. If a context switch occurs between updating the user and performing the operation, the operation might execute with an incorrect user context, leading to unintended behavior or security issues.
How to fix Context Switching Race Condition?
To fix this issue, we should ensure that the operations are atomic, meaning they should be executed as a single, indivisible operation. This can be achieved by using locks to synchronize threads. In Python, threading.Lock
can be used to ensure that only one thread can update and access the current_user
at a time, preventing race conditions.
Fixed Code Example
import threading
class AccountManager:
def __init__(self):
self.current_user = None
self.lock = threading.Lock() # Initialize a lock to manage access to the critical section
def switch_user(self, user):
with self.lock: # Acquire the lock to ensure exclusive access
self.current_user = user
# Now the context switch and sensitive operation are atomic
self.perform_sensitive_operation()
def perform_sensitive_operation(self):
# Sensitive operation that should only be performed by the current user
print(f"Performing operation for {self.current_user}")
def user_switching_simulation():
manager = AccountManager()
def switch_to_user(user):
manager.switch_user(user)
# Simulating context switch by threads
thread1 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User1",))
thread2 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User2",))
thread1.start()
thread2.start()
thread1.join()
thread2.join()
user_switching_simulation()
Explanation
In the fixed code, a threading.Lock()
object is used to ensure that switch_user()
operates atomically. By using with self.lock
, the context switch and the subsequent sensitive operation are protected, ensuring that only one thread can execute these lines at a time. This prevents race conditions and ensures that the correct user context is used during sensitive operations, thereby maintaining the integrity of the operation.