CWE-368: Context Switching Race Condition

Learn about CWE-368 (Context Switching Race Condition), its security impact, exploitation methods, and prevention guidelines.

What is Context Switching Race Condition?

• Overview: Context Switching Race Condition occurs when a software system performs a series of non-atomic actions to transition between different security contexts, such as privilege levels, and a race condition allows an attacker to interfere with or alter the behavior of the system during this transition.

• Exploitation Methods:

  • Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by timing their actions to coincide with the context switch, allowing them to execute unauthorized actions.
  • Common attack patterns include manipulating shared resources or state during the switch, or injecting malicious inputs that are processed with elevated privileges.

• Security Impact:

  • Direct consequences of successful exploitation include unauthorized access to privileged information or resources.
  • Potential cascading effects could lead to broader system compromise or further exploitation of other vulnerabilities.
  • Business impact might involve unauthorized data access, data breaches, or service disruptions, leading to financial loss and reputational damage.

• Prevention Guidelines:

  • Specific code-level fixes include implementing atomic operations for context switching to ensure actions cannot be interrupted or altered.
  • Security best practices involve validating inputs and outputs at each context boundary and ensuring state integrity throughout the transition.
  • Recommended tools and frameworks include those that support atomic transactions and race condition detection, such as concurrency models and static analysis tools.

Corgea can automatically detect and fix Context Switching Race Condition in your codebase. Try Corgea free today.

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified

Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not specified

Vulnerable Code Example

import threading

class AccountManager:
    def __init__(self):
        self.current_user = None

    def switch_user(self, user):
        # Vulnerable code: context switch is not atomic
        self.current_user = user  # This line is vulnerable to race conditions
        # Some operations that assume current_user is the correct user
        self.perform_sensitive_operation()

    def perform_sensitive_operation(self):
        # Sensitive operation that should only be performed by the current user
        print(f"Performing operation for {self.current_user}")

def user_switching_simulation():
    manager = AccountManager()

    def switch_to_user(user):
        manager.switch_user(user)

    # Simulating context switch by threads
    thread1 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User1",))
    thread2 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User2",))

    thread1.start()
    thread2.start()

    thread1.join()
    thread2.join()

user_switching_simulation()

Explanation

In this code, switch_user() updates the current_user and then performs a sensitive operation assuming that the current_user is correctly set. However, this context switch is not atomic, leading to a race condition. If a context switch occurs between updating the user and performing the operation, the operation might execute with an incorrect user context, leading to unintended behavior or security issues.

How to fix Context Switching Race Condition?

To fix this issue, we should ensure that the operations are atomic, meaning they should be executed as a single, indivisible operation. This can be achieved by using locks to synchronize threads. In Python, threading.Lock can be used to ensure that only one thread can update and access the current_user at a time, preventing race conditions.

Fixed Code Example

import threading

class AccountManager:
    def __init__(self):
        self.current_user = None
        self.lock = threading.Lock()  # Initialize a lock to manage access to the critical section

    def switch_user(self, user):
        with self.lock:  # Acquire the lock to ensure exclusive access
            self.current_user = user
            # Now the context switch and sensitive operation are atomic
            self.perform_sensitive_operation()

    def perform_sensitive_operation(self):
        # Sensitive operation that should only be performed by the current user
        print(f"Performing operation for {self.current_user}")

def user_switching_simulation():
    manager = AccountManager()

    def switch_to_user(user):
        manager.switch_user(user)

    # Simulating context switch by threads
    thread1 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User1",))
    thread2 = threading.Thread(target=switch_to_user, args=("User2",))

    thread1.start()
    thread2.start()

    thread1.join()
    thread2.join()

user_switching_simulation()

Explanation

In the fixed code, a threading.Lock() object is used to ensure that switch_user() operates atomically. By using with self.lock, the context switch and the subsequent sensitive operation are protected, ensuring that only one thread can execute these lines at a time. This prevents race conditions and ensures that the correct user context is used during sensitive operations, thereby maintaining the integrity of the operation.

Corgea Logo

Find this vulnerability and fix it with Corgea

Scan your codebase for CWE-368: Context Switching Race Condition and get remediation guidance

Start for free and no credit card needed.