CWE-351: Insufficient Type Distinction

What is Insufficient Type Distinction?

• Overview: Insufficient Type Distinction occurs when software fails to properly differentiate between various types of elements, leading to potential security vulnerabilities by treating different data types alike when they should be distinct.

• Exploitation Methods:

• Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating data to be interpreted incorrectly, leading to unauthorized access or actions.
• Common attack patterns include type confusion and type juggling, where the software misinterprets data types, causing unexpected behavior.

• Security Impact:

• Direct consequences include unauthorized data access, control flow disruptions, and incorrect data processing.
• Potential cascading effects involve broader system compromise, as initial unauthorized actions may lead to further exploitation.
• Business impact can include data breaches, loss of customer trust, legal penalties, and financial losses.

• Prevention Guidelines:

• Specific code-level fixes include implementing strict type checks and validation to ensure that data types are correctly identified and handled.
• Security best practices involve using strong typing, explicit type conversions, and avoiding assumptions about data formats.
• Recommended tools and frameworks include static analysis tools for detecting type-related issues and using languages or frameworks that enforce strict typing.

Corgea can automatically detect and fix Insufficient Type Distinction in your codebase. Try Corgea free today.

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified

Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not specified

Vulnerable Code Example

class UserAuthenticator {
    constructor(users) {
        this.users = users;
    }

    authenticate(id) {
        // Vulnerable to insufficient type distinction
        // If 'id' is expected to be a number but a string is passed,
        // it could cause incorrect behavior due to type coercion in JavaScript.
        return this.users[id];  // This uses implicit type coercion
    }
}

const users = {123: "Alice", 456: "Bob"};
const authenticator = new UserAuthenticator(users);

// This will incorrectly authenticate if 'id' is not strictly checked
console.log(authenticator.authenticate("123"));  // Should not match, but does due to implicit type coercion

How to fix Insufficient Type Distinction?

In JavaScript, to prevent vulnerabilities due to insufficient type distinction, avoid relying on JavaScript's implicit type coercion. Instead, use strict type checks to ensure that inputs are of the expected types before processing them. JavaScript's typeof can be used for type checking. Additionally, enforce stricter type validation and throw errors for incorrect types.

Best practices include:

• Use typeof or instanceof to check input types explicitly.
• Convert inputs to the expected type when possible, or reject them if they don't meet type requirements.
• Use linters or TypeScript for static type checking in larger projects.

Fixed Code Example

class UserAuthenticator {
    constructor(users) {
        this.users = users;
    }

    authenticate(id) {
        // Enforce number type for 'id'
        if (typeof id !== 'number') {
            throw new TypeError("id must be a number");  // Throw an error for incorrect type
        }
        
        return this.users[id];  // Access the user with the correct type
    }
}

const users = {123: "Alice", 456: "Bob"};
const authenticator = new UserAuthenticator(users);

// Correctly raising an exception when 'id' is not a number
try {
    console.log(authenticator.authenticate("123"));  // Throws TypeError
} catch (e) {
    console.log(`Error: \${e.message}`);
}

These examples demonstrate the importance of enforcing strict type checks to prevent vulnerabilities related to insufficient type distinction. By explicitly validating input types, you can avoid unexpected behavior and potential security risks.