CWE-241: Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type

What is Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type?

• Overview: Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type (CWE-241) occurs when a software application does not correctly process data that does not match the expected type. For example, the software expects a numeric input (0-9) but receives an alphabetic character (A-Z), which can lead to errors or vulnerabilities.

• Exploitation Methods:

• Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by inputting unexpected data types to cause unintended behavior or to bypass input validation.
• Common attack patterns include type confusion, where the program is tricked into treating data as a different type, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data manipulation.

• Security Impact:

• Direct consequences of successful exploitation can include application crashes, unauthorized access, or data corruption.
• Potential cascading effects might involve further exploitation, such as privilege escalation or denial-of-service attacks.
• Business impact could include loss of customer trust, legal liabilities, and financial losses due to system downtime or data breaches.

• Prevention Guidelines:

• Specific code-level fixes include implementing strict type-checking and validation mechanisms to ensure data matches expected types.
• Security best practices involve using safe programming languages and libraries that enforce strong typing and input validation.
• Recommended tools and frameworks include static analysis tools to detect type mismatches and frameworks that provide robust input validation utilities.

Corgea can automatically detect and fix Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type in your codebase. Try Corgea free today.

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified

Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not specified

Vulnerable Code Example

def process_user_input(data):
    # The function expects a list of integers, but does not validate the data type of each element
    total = sum(data)  # Vulnerable line: assumes all elements are integers
    print(f"Total is: {total}")

# Example of a call that could lead to issues
process_user_input([1, 2, '3', 4])  # This will cause a TypeError

Explanation:

• The process_user_input function is designed to work with a list of integers.
• It directly uses the sum function, which assumes that all elements in the list are integers.
• If the list contains a non-integer element, such as a string, the sum function will raise a TypeError.
• This can lead to unexpected crashes, especially if the input is not validated, posing a risk in production environments.

How to fix Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type?

To fix this issue, the function should validate the data type of each element in the input list before processing it. This can be done using type-checking mechanisms to ensure that all elements are integers. If any element does not meet the expected type, the function should handle it gracefully by either raising an informative exception or converting the elements to the expected type if feasible.

Fixed Code Example

def process_user_input(data):
    # Validate that each element is an integer
    if not all(isinstance(item, int) for item in data):
        raise ValueError("All elements must be integers")

    total = sum(data)  # Safe line: all elements are ensured to be integers
    print(f"Total is: {total}")

# Example of a call that will be handled correctly
try:
    process_user_input([1, 2, '3', 4])  # This will raise a ValueError
except ValueError as e:
    print(f"Error: {e}")

Explanation:

• The updated process_user_input function includes a validation step using isinstance to check that all elements in the list are integers.
• If any element is not an integer, the function raises a ValueError with a descriptive message, preventing the function from crashing unexpectedly.
• This approach provides clear feedback on what went wrong, allowing for safer and more predictable data handling.
• By ensuring that data is validated before processing, the code adheres to robust coding practices, reducing the risk of runtime errors.