CWE-1342: Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution

What is Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution?

• Overview: This vulnerability arises when a processor fails to properly clear microarchitectural states after incorrect or speculative execution, leaving traces that could leak sensitive information through side-channel attacks.

• Exploitation Methods:

• Attackers exploit this by performing side-channel analysis to detect changes in microarchitectural states.
• Common attack patterns include Load Value Injection (LVI), where attackers inject erroneous values into buffers to extract sensitive data.

• Security Impact:

• Direct consequences include unauthorized access to sensitive data.
• Potential cascading effects might involve broader system compromise if critical data is leaked.
• Business impact could be significant, involving data breaches, loss of customer trust, and legal ramifications.

• Prevention Guidelines:

• Specific code-level fixes are limited due to the hardware nature of the vulnerability; focus on minimizing speculative execution in critical code paths.
• Security best practices include keeping systems updated with latest patches from CPU vendors.
• Recommended tools and frameworks involve using compiler or OS-level mitigations that reduce speculative execution risks, such as those provided by Intel or AMD for known vulnerabilities.

Corgea can automatically detect and fix Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution in your codebase. [Try Corgea free today](https://corgea.app).

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified

Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not Technology-Specific, System on Chip

Vulnerable Code Example

# vulnerable_processor.py {10-14}
import numpy as np

def process_data(data):
    # Vulnerable speculative execution code path
    # This simulates a scenario where speculative execution could lead to information exposure
    # due to not properly handling microarchitectural state
    if len(data) > 10:
        # Speculative access to out-of-bounds element
        secret_value = np.random.randint(0, 100)  # Simulated secret data
        index = int(data[11])  # Potentially out-of-bounds access based on speculative execution
        return secret_value + index  # The secret data might be exposed through speculative execution
    return sum(data)

Explanation of Vulnerability:

• Speculative Execution: The code allows speculative execution to potentially access an out-of-bounds index, which can inadvertently expose sensitive data through microarchitectural side channels.
• Lack of Bounds Checking: The index access int(data[11]) does not properly check if 11 is within the bounds of the data array, leading to unsafe speculative execution.

How to fix Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution?

The vulnerability stems from speculative execution potentially accessing out-of-bounds memory, inadvertently exposing sensitive data through microarchitectural side channels. To fix this, we should ensure that any code involving speculative execution checks bounds explicitly before accessing memory or performing calculations that could leak sensitive information.

Fix Strategy:

1. Bounds Checking: Always ensure that array accesses and index calculations are bounds-checked before use.
2. Avoid Speculative Execution: Ensure code paths that can be speculatively executed do not involve sensitive data operations.
3. Use Data-Oblivious Programming: Refrain from using data-dependent conditional branches that could lead to speculative execution.

Fixed Code Example

# fixed_processor.py {10-19}
import numpy as np

def process_data(data):
    # Fixed code with proper bounds checking and data-oblivious operations
    # This ensures that speculative execution paths do not cause unintended data exposure
    if len(data) > 11:
        # Proper bounds check to prevent out-of-bounds access
        safe_index = min(11, len(data) - 1)  # Ensures the index is within bounds
        secret_value = np.random.randint(0, 100)  # Simulated secret data
        # Data-oblivious calculation avoids relying on speculative execution
        return secret_value + (data[safe_index] if safe_index < len(data) else 0)
    return sum(data)

Key Security Controls:

• Bounds Checking: The min function ensures that the index is within the bounds of the data array, preventing speculative execution from accessing out-of-bounds memory.
• Data-Oblivious Calculation: The index calculation uses a safe, non-speculative approach that does not depend on potentially unsafe conditional logic, mitigating the risk of leaking sensitive information.

Additional Best Practices:

• Avoid Using Secret Data in Speculative Paths: Ensure that any secret data is not used in a way that could be exposed through speculative execution paths.
• Use Compiler and Hardware Mitigations: Where possible, leverage compiler flags and hardware features designed to mitigate speculative execution vulnerabilities.