CWE-1253: Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values

Learn about CWE-1253 (Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values), its security impact, exploitation methods, and prevention guidelines.

What is Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values?

• Overview: Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values (CWE-1253) is a vulnerability where the security of a system relies on fuses being unblown to maintain a secure state. If fuses are blown, an attacker can change the system to an insecure state.

• Exploitation Methods:

  • Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by physically blowing the fuses, which may be possible through direct access to the hardware.
  • Common attack patterns include manipulating fuse states to bypass security configurations and gain unauthorized access.

• Security Impact:

  • Direct consequences of successful exploitation include system compromise and unauthorized access to sensitive data or operations.
  • Potential cascading effects may involve further exploitation of system vulnerabilities or exposure of additional security weaknesses.
  • Business impact can be severe, including data breaches, loss of customer trust, and potential financial penalties.

• Prevention Guidelines:

  • Specific code-level fixes include ensuring that security logic does not rely solely on fuse states and incorporating additional security checks.
  • Security best practices involve using multi-layered security approaches and avoiding negative logic reliance for critical security states.
  • Recommended tools and frameworks include using hardware security modules (HSMs) and implementing tamper-resistant designs in hardware.
Corgea can automatically detect and fix Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values in your codebase. [Try Corgea free today](https://corgea.app).

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified

Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not Technology-Specific

Vulnerable Code Example

class SystemSecurity:
    def __init__(self):
        # Using a simple flag to denote secure state based on fuse status
        # If fuse is intact (False), the system is secure; if blown (True), it is not
        self.fuse_blown = False
    
    def check_system_security(self):
        # Security logic is inverted; the system should be secure when the fuse is unblown
        if self.fuse_blown:
            return "System is insecure!"
        return "System is secure!"

Explanation:

  • Vulnerability: The security of the system relies solely on a single boolean flag, fuse_blown. This makes the system vulnerable because an attacker could easily manipulate this flag to alter the security state. The logic incorrectly assumes that if the fuse is blown (fuse_blown = True), the system is insecure, which is a simplistic and unreliable security measure.

How to fix Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values?

To address this issue, the security state should incorporate multiple checks and not depend solely on a single flag. This creates a more robust and secure system that is less susceptible to being compromised by a single point of failure.

Best Practices:

  1. Redundant Checks: Implement multiple checks to ensure the system's secure state is not reliant on a single point of failure.
  2. Use Secure Defaults: The default state of the system should be secure, with deviations requiring strict validation.
  3. Validation and Monitoring: Regularly validate system security states and monitor for unauthorized changes.

Fixed Code Example

class SystemSecurity:
    def __init__(self):
        # Default secure state, independent of fuse state directly
        self.fuse_blown = False
        self.secure_mode_enabled = True  # Adding an additional security measure

    def validate_security(self):
        # Additional security logic to ensure comprehensive checks
        return not self.fuse_blown and self.secure_mode_enabled

    def check_system_security(self):
        # Corrected logic to ensure system security is robust
        if not self.validate_security():
            return "System is insecure!"
        return "System is secure!"

Explanation:

  • Fix Implementation: Introduced a secure_mode_enabled flag that defaults to True, adding an additional layer of security. The validate_security method checks both fuse_blown and secure_mode_enabled to ensure a comprehensive security assessment. This approach mitigates the risk of a single point of failure.
  • Robust Security Logic: The check_system_security method now utilizes validate_security, which combines multiple conditions to determine the security status, thereby enhancing the system's resilience against attacks.
Corgea Logo

Find this vulnerability and fix it with Corgea

Scan your codebase for CWE-1253: Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values and get remediation guidance

Start for free and no credit card needed.