CWE-1059: Insufficient Technical Documentation

What is Insufficient Technical Documentation?

• Overview: Insufficient Technical Documentation refers to a situation where a product lacks detailed descriptions of its software or hardware components, including usage, structure, architecture, interfaces, and design. This absence makes maintenance challenging and can impede the identification and remediation of vulnerabilities.

• Exploitation Methods:

• Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by taking advantage of the difficulty in understanding the system's inner workings due to poor documentation, potentially leading to overlooked vulnerabilities.
• Common attack patterns include exploiting misconfigurations, design flaws, and implementation errors that remain unidentified due to insufficient documentation.

• Security Impact:

• Direct consequences include delays in vulnerability identification and mitigation, increasing the window of exposure to threats.
• Potential cascading effects involve improper system updates and patches, leading to further security loopholes.
• Business impact includes increased costs for maintenance and security assessments, and potential reputational damage due to security breaches.

• Prevention Guidelines:

• Specific code-level fixes include documenting code thoroughly with comments and explanations for complex logic and design decisions.
• Security best practices involve maintaining comprehensive, up-to-date documentation that covers all aspects of the product, including design and implementation details.
• Recommended tools and frameworks include using integrated documentation tools and platforms like Javadoc for Java or Doxygen for C++, and employing version control systems to keep documentation synchronized with code changes.

Corgea can automatically detect and fix Insufficient Technical Documentation in your codebase. Try Corgea free today.

Technical Details

Likelihood of Exploit: Not specified

Affected Languages: Not Language-Specific

Affected Technologies: Not Technology-Specific, ICS/OT

Vulnerable Code Example

/**
 * This function attempts to authenticate a user without sufficient documentation.
 * It lacks details about the parameters, return values, and error handling.
 */
function authenticateUser(username, password) {
    return username === 'admin' && password === 'password123';
}

How to fix Insufficient Technical Documentation?

To address insufficient documentation in JavaScript, we should include comments and documentation within the code. This documentation should cover:

1. The purpose of the function.
2. The input parameters and their expected types.
3. The return value and its type.
4. Any potential errors or conditions that might affect the function's behavior.

Proper documentation ensures that the code is understandable, maintainable, and can be easily used by other developers.

Fixed Code Example

/**
 * Authenticate a user based on username and password.
 *
 * This function checks if the provided username and password match
 * the hardcoded credentials. It is important to note that using hardcoded
 * credentials is a security risk and should only be used for demonstration purposes.
 *
 * @param {string} username - The username of the user attempting to log in.
 * @param {string} password - The password provided by the user.
 * @returns {boolean} True if authentication is successful, false otherwise.
 * @throws {Error} Throws an error if the input types are incorrect.
 */
function authenticateUser(username, password) {
    if (typeof username !== 'string' || typeof password !== 'string') {
        throw new Error('Both username and password must be strings.');
    }
    return username === 'admin' && password === 'password123';
}

In both examples, proper documentation has been added to clarify the usage, expectations, and behavior of the code, mitigating the CWE-1059 vulnerability. The fixed code example also includes a note about the security risk of using hardcoded credentials, which is a critical aspect of understanding the function's limitations and potential vulnerabilities.