Choosing the Right Application Security Testing Strategy

When it comes to securing your applications, choosing the right testing strategy is critical. Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) are two of the most widely used methods, but how do you decide which one is right for you?

In this article, we’ll break down the differences, benefits, and drawbacks of each approach—and show you how AI-powered tools are making these methods smarter, faster, and more reliable.

---

What is SAST? (Static Application Security Testing)

SAST is like a code detective that examines your source code, bytecode, or binaries without running the application. It looks at everything before the app even sees the light of day, identifying potential vulnerabilities by analyzing the codebase line by line.

---

Benefits of Traditional SAST

• Early Detection: Finds vulnerabilities early in development—when they’re easiest and cheapest to fix.
• Thorough Analysis: Capable of detecting even deep business logic flaws.
• Supports Secure Coding: Encourages developers to address security as they write code.

---

Challenges of Traditional SAST

While useful, traditional SAST does have some key limitations:

Vulnerabilities Traditional SAST Can’t Detect

• Runtime Issues: Misses vulnerabilities that appear only during execution (e.g., broken authentication, misconfigurations, insecure API calls).
• Complex Business Logic Flaws: Struggles to identify logic issues involving multiple dynamic inputs.
• Memory Corruption and Heap Overflows: These often require runtime context that SAST can’t analyze.

---

AI-Powered SAST: Overcoming Traditional Challenges

AI-powered tools like Corgea enhance SAST by going beyond traditional scanning:

• Understand Code Context: AI understands flows and logic, not just patterns.
• Detect Complex Vulnerabilities: Identifies business logic flaws that static analysis alone might miss.
• Smarter Detection: For example, Corgea can analyze dynamic web applications with complex data flow and business rules.

---

SAST in Action: Before and After Example

🐞 Before: Vulnerable Code (Command Injection in Python)

hostname = request.GET['hostname']
output = subprocess.check_output("ping " + hostname, shell=True)

Vulnerability: No input validation — attacker can inject commands.

---

✅ After: Secure Code (Input Validation Added)

import re

hostname = request.GET['hostname']
if re.match("^[a-zA-Z0-9]+\$", hostname):
    output = subprocess.check_output(["ping", hostname])

Most SAST tools would flag the initial code due to unsafe user input handling. AI-powered tools like Corgea recognize this as a classic command injection vulnerability.

---

Complex Example: AI-Powered SAST Detecting Hidden Vulnerabilities

🐞 Before: Vulnerable Code (Business Logic Flaw)

user_role = request.form['user_role']
if user_role == 'admin':
    apply_discount()

Vulnerability: User can manipulate user_role and gain unauthorized access.

---

✅ After: Secure Code

user_role = session.get('user_role')
if is_user_authenticated() and user_role == 'admin':
    apply_discount()

• Replaces request.form['user_role'] with session.get('user_role')
• Adds is_user_authenticated() to verify user identity
• Ensures only authenticated admins receive the discount

Traditional SAST would likely miss this logic flaw. Corgea detects it by understanding intent and context.

---

What is DAST? (Dynamic Application Security Testing)

DAST tests applications while they’re running—like running a simulated attack against a live system. It’s ideal for finding runtime issues such as broken authentication and API vulnerabilities.

---

Benefits of Traditional DAST

• Real-World Testing: Finds issues that only appear in a live environment
• No Source Code Needed: Ideal for black-box testing
• Live Threat Detection: Simulates actual attack behavior

---

Challenges of Traditional DAST

• Late Detection: Scans after deployment, potentially missing early-stage bugs
• Limited Coverage: May overlook code-deep flaws or logic issues
• Performance Impact: Resource-intensive, potentially slowing down apps during testing

---

DAST in Action: Before and After Example

🐞 Before: Vulnerable Code (No Password Hashing)

if request.form['password'] == stored_password:
    login_user()

Vulnerability: Plaintext password comparison — vulnerable to brute-force attacks.

---

✅ After: Secure Code (Password Hashing)

from werkzeug.security import check_password_hash

if check_password_hash(stored_password, request.form['password']):
    login_user()

DAST would flag the first example as insecure due to lack of hashing. The second is runtime secure.

---

SAST vs DAST: Key Differences

Feature	SAST	DAST
Code Access	Requires source code	No source code needed
Detection Stage	Early in development	After deployment (runtime)
Vulnerability Focus	Code flaws, logic vulnerabilities	Runtime issues like auth, APIs
False Positives	Higher due to static context	Lower, simulates real-world attacks
CI/CD Integration	Can be complex	Requires live app, easier setup

---

The AI Advantage: Smarter SAST

AI is changing how SAST works:

• Reduces False Positives: By understanding code intent
• Catches Complex Vulnerabilities: Including business logic flaws
• Boosts Developer Efficiency: Reduces noise and context-switching

Tools like Corgea bring static testing to life with intelligent insights—early, accurate, and developer-friendly.

---

So, Which One Should You Choose?

• Choose SAST when you want early detection and have access to the source code.
• Choose DAST when testing live systems or simulating real-world attacks.

🧠 Pro Tip:

Combine both for a complete strategy. With AI-powered tools like Corgea, you get the best of both worlds—early detection and runtime coverage, enhanced by smart analysis.

---

Conclusion: The Future of Application Security

Choosing between SAST and DAST isn’t about picking one. It’s about using the right tool at the right time.

With AI-driven tools like Corgea, security becomes:

• Faster
• Smarter
• More contextual

By combining SAST + DAST and powering them with AI, you’re securing your app at every stage—from code to cloud.